Friday, March 25, 2016

குளிர்ந்த நீர் உடலுக்கு நல்லதல்ல !

வெயில் காலங்களில் குளிர்ந்த நீரைப் பருகினால் புத்துணர்ச்சி கிடைக்கும். ஆனால் சீனாவில் இதை யாரும் ஏற்றுக்கொள்வதில்லை. வெயிலோ, மழையோ எந்தக் காலங்களிலும் சூடான நீரையே பருகுகிறார்கள். பெரும்பாலானவர்கள் வெளியே செல்லும்போது ஃப்ளாஸ்கில் சுடுதண்ணீர் எடுத்துக்கொள்கிறார்கள். தண்ணீர் தீர்ந்துவிட்டாலும்கூட ஆங்காங்கே தண்ணீர்க் குழாய்களில் வரும் சுடுநீரைப் பிடித்துக்கொள்கிறார்கள்.

குளிர்ந்த நீர் உடலுக்கு நல்லதல்ல என்ற எண்ணம் பெரும்பாலான சீனர்களிடம் இருக்கிறது. 1949-ம் ஆண்டில் கம்யூனிஸ சீனாவில் ஓர் அறிவிப்பு வெளியானது. குழாய்களில் வரும் நீர் அவ்வளவு தூய்மையாக இல்லாததால், தண்ணீரைக் காய்ச்சி, வடிகட்டி குடிக்க வேண்டும் என்று அறிவுறுத்தப்பட்டது. வீடுகள், அலுவலகங்கள், உணவு விடுதிகள் என எங்கும் சுடு தண்ணீர் குடிக்க ஆரம்பித்தனர். பழங்காலச் சீன மருத்துவத்திலும் சூடான நீருக்கு முக்கியத்துவம் அளிக்கப்பட்டிருக்கிறது.

சூடான நீர் விரைவில் ஜீரணமாக்கும், ரத்த ஓட்டத்தை அதிகரிக்கும், நச்சுகள் வெளியேற உதவும். குளிர்ந்த நீர் தசைப் பிடிப்பு ஏற்படுத்தும், உடல் உறுப்புகள் மெதுவாக இயங்க வைக்கும். சூடான நீரையும் குளிர்ந்த நீரையும் கலந்து பருகக்கூடாது என்கிறது சீன மருத்துவ குறிப்புகள். பழங்காலத்தில் இருந்தே புழக்கத்தில் இருக்கும் தேநீர் கலாசாரத்தில் இருந்து சுடு நீர் பருகும் பழக்கம் உருவாகியிருக்கலாம் என்று சிலர் கூறுகிறார்கள்.

சீனாவின் அண்டை நாடுகளான ஜப்பான், கொரியாவிலும் நீண்ட காலமாக தேநீர் குடிக்கும் பழக்கம் இருந்து வருகிறது. பொதுவாக சுடு தண்ணீர் குடிப்பது உடலுக்கு நல்லது என்ற எண்ணம் எல்லோரிடமும் உறுதியாக இருக்கிறது. எனவே வெளி நாடுகளுக்குச் சென்றால்கூட இந்தப் பழக்கத்தை சீனர்கள் மாற்றிக்கொள்வதில்லை.

source : Tamil Hindu

Friday, March 18, 2016

2 Out Of 3 Indians Drink Milk Laced With Detergent, Urea And Paint !!!

On Wednesday, the Union Minister for Science and Technology, Harsh Vardhan, brought up the prevailing issue of adulteration of food items in the Lok Sabha. Vardhan stated that over 68% of the milk sold in India did not meet the standards set by the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI), India’s food regulating body.

Discovering the magnitude of contamination
He was referring to the National Survey on Milk Adulteration, a snap shot survey, which conducted in 2011 by the FSSAI to check the contaminant levels in milk consumed by the Indians. The study had shown that, owing to lack of hygiene and sanitation in the handling and packaging of milk, several contaminants make their way into commercially sold milk. Detergents that are used for cleaning are not washed off properly and hence make their way packaged the milk. Adulterants like urea, starch, glucose and formalin are added to increase the thickness and viscosity of the milk and to increase its shelf life.

After taking samples from 28 states and five union territories in 2011, nearly 70% of the samples proved to be adulterated in some form or the other. Nearly 46% of adulteration was accounted for by the dilution of milk with water out of a total of 1791 samples that were tested. Almost 8% of these tested samples contained detergents.

How harmful can it be?
The Indian Council of Medical Research had mentioned that detergents in milk cause food poisoning and gastrointestinal complications. Some other commonly used synthetic adulterants cause numerous impairments, heart problems, cancer and even death. The immediate effects of consuming urea could be gastroenteritis, but the long term effects could be fatal.

The statement by the Union Minister is likely to cause alarm in a country whose important source of protein is milk. Last year, a US government report projected an increase in fluid milk consumption by 5% in 2016 based on the population growth in the country.

Can we combat it?
Mr.Harsh Vardhan mentioned his concerns over the health issues resulting from impurity laden milk consumption and also spoke about the new scanner that can detect adulteration in milk in 40 seconds. Unlike earlier, when separate chemical tests were required to detect different contaminants, the new scanner developed by the Central Electronics Engineering Research Institute in Rajasthan’s Pilani town. According to the minister, “The innovation represents the first fully Indian concept towards implementation effort in the instrumentation related to milk and dairy, addressing an unmet need.” He also added that “In the near future, GPS-based technology could be used to track the exact location where the milk supplied in the cold chain has been tampered with.”

The Minister also made some controversial suggestions that the scanners could be purchased by MPs through their constituency funds. He also mentioned that the cost per test conducted using these expensive scanners would only amount to 10 paisa.

Source : The Logical Indian

Wednesday, March 16, 2016

Indian Govt. Bans 344 Drugs, Including Vicks Action 500 Extra, Corex & Sumo !!!

On 10th March, 2016, the government banned the use of fixed dose combination drugs produced by several companies.

The list of drugs that may go off the chemists’ shelves:
  1. Procter and Gamble (P&G): Vicks Action 500 Extra
  2. Abbott: Cough Syrup Phensedyl, Tossex and triple combination diabetes drug Tribet
  3. Cipla: Triple combination diabetes drug Triexer most impacted
  4. Pfizer: Cough Syrup Corex
  5. Lupin: Triple combination diabetes drug Gluconorm most impacted
  6. Wockhardt: Zedex cough syrups, Ace Proxyvan impacted
  7. Glenmark: Most of the impact is on account of Ascoril range of cough syrups
  8. Ipca: Zerodol P (Paracetamol + Aceclofenac)
  9. Sun Pharma: The most impacted is triple anti diabetes combination drug Gemer P (Meltformin + pioglitazone + glimeperide)
  10. Alkem: Sumo (Nimesulide + Paracetamol) and Taxim AZ (Azithromycin + Cefixime)
  11. Mankind: The impact is spread across multiple products
  12. Macleods: Panderum Plus


The sale of cough syrup Corex and Phensedyl produced by drug majors Pfizer and Abbott respectively have already been stopped from Monday. US drugmaker Abbott Laboratories accounts for almost a third of the Indian cough syrup market and the sale of Phensedyl is estimated to constitute 3% of Abbott’s $ 1 billion Indian revenue.

What does a combination drug mean?
A combination drug refers to that medicine in which several drugs are combined in order to enable a patient to take one medicine instead of several. Thus, it enhances patients’ compliance. Unfortunately, there has been inconsistent enforcement of drug laws in India. Instead of approval by central government there has been regulation by state governments, leading to proliferation of combination drugs.
By 2014 more than 6000 such drugs were in market only by state approval. Hence, the Health Ministry gave pharmaceutical companies an opportunity to prove the safety and efficacy of these drugs on the basis of submitted data. A committee was set up to classify the drugs into rational, irrational and those that need further studies based on the data received.

Concern behind the review:
 According to doctors and public health experts in India and abroad, increasing use of combination drugs is dangerous since there is an alarming risk of antibiotic resistance in patients. They opine that it did not make sense to prescribe such drugs for cold and fever. The market share of combination drugs versus single drugs in India is the highest in the world.
 In December last year, Reuters had reported that a powerful antibiotic cocktail sold in India by companies like Abbott and local drug makers was not even approved by the central government. It is to be noted that many combinations were not even approved for sale in countries like the US, UK, Germany, France, Japan and Australia.

Current status of these drugs:
 KL Sharma, a joint secretary at the health ministry has told the Reuters, “Now based on responses (and) assessment of products, more than 300 drugs have been prohibited.” Although he did not name the drugs, an official notice is expected to be issued in a few days. No comment has been made by the Drug Controller General of India.
 However, the move might hugely affect the profits of various companies unless they launch new products quickly to retain a large number of sales, opines Nomura.

Delhi High Court stays the ban:
 Various drug makers had filed a petition in Delhi High Court challenging the ban. Their argument is that though those drugs had been in circulation for several years, the government had not granted any show cause notice to seek explanation earlier. They would like to explain the compliance with respect to safety. On the other hand, the government asserts that there is no obligation to serve a show cause notice since it is a matter of public interest.
 In view of this debate, the high court has stayed the ban on Pfizer, Abbott and MacLeod till the next hearing on March 21st. It has also asked the government to explain its position and actions behind the March 10th notification, as reported by Ashmit Kumar of CNBC-TV18. No coercive action can be taken against the companies as of now. However, the stay on the ban is not extended to all the drug makers.


Friday, March 11, 2016

Johnson & Johnson To Pay $72 Million For Cancer Death Linked To Talcum Powder!!!

The company faces claims that it failed for decades to warn consumers that its talc-based products could cause cancer.
Johnson & Johnson was ordered by a Missouri state jury to pay $72 million of damages to the family of a woman whose death from ovarian cancer was linked to her use of the company's talc-based Baby Powder and Shower to Shower for several decades.

In a verdict announced late Monday night, jurors in the circuit court of St. Louis awarded the family of Jacqueline Fox $10 million of actual damages and $62 million of punitive damages, according to the family's lawyers and court records.
The verdict is the first by a U.S. jury to award damages over the claims, the lawyers said.
Johnson & Johnson faces claims that it, in an effort to boost sales, failed for decades to warn consumers that its talc-based products could cause cancer. About 1,000 cases have been filed in Missouri state court, and another 200 in New Jersey.
Fox, who lived in Birmingham, Alabama, claimed she used Baby Powder and Shower to Shower for feminine hygiene for more than 35 years before being diagnosed three years ago with ovarian cancer. She died in October at age 62.
Jurors found Johnson & Johnson liable for fraud, negligence and conspiracy, the family's lawyers said. Deliberations lasted four hours, following a three-week trial.
Jere Beasley, a lawyer for Fox's family, said Johnson & Johnson "knew as far back as the 1980s of the risk," and yet resorted to "lying to the public, lying to the regulatory agencies." He spoke on a conference call with journalists.
Carol Goodrich, a Johnson & Johnson spokeswoman, said: "We have no higher responsibility than the health and safety of consumers, and we are disappointed with the outcome of the trial. We sympathize with the plaintiff's family but firmly believe the safety of cosmetic talc is supported by decades of scientific evidence."
Trials in several other talc lawsuits have been set for later this year, according to Danielle Mason, who also represented Fox's family at trial.
In October 2013, a federal jury in Sioux Falls, South Dakota found that plaintiff Deane Berg's use of Johnson & Johnson's body powder products was a factor in her developing ovarian cancer. Nevertheless, it awarded no damages, court records show.
Valeant Pharmaceuticals International Inc now owns the Shower to Shower brand but was not a defendant in the Fox case.
Source : huffpost.com